Deep within the Shadows of the Bible - Meeting Place for Reverts/Converts To Shmizlam
Deep within the Shadows of the Bible
at NEW SHMOOS FOR SHMOTA WEBSITE
Deep within the Shadows of the Bible
We find ourselves coming up with new ideas in our system of belief. The innovations we
make cause our real belief to fall into cultural belief. One of the greatest examples one
could use in the destruction of Christianity. So much culture and personal explanation has
been added into the faith that the followers don’t even know what they believe anymore.
And when the truth is given to them, they have no other choice than to reject it.
In their belief system, some Christians believe in the one unique, unimaginable God, while
other Christians believe that Jesus is God. However, most Christians believe that Jesus is
the physical embodied divine Son of God. How can Jesus be God and the Son of God at the
same time when God is one?
The Christian faith is based on the Trinity. The trinity best explained is: the Father
(which is God/Jesus), the Son (which is Jesus/God) and the Holy Spirit (which is Jesus/God)
all making up one God. The simple awareness of commonsense has to arise that one plus one
plus one equals three, not one. How does this whole concept fit into the monotheistic
spectrum?
Many Christian scholars have been asked to explain the trinity in their own words of wisdom from
knowledge in order for others to understand in this modern era. Just about 90% of all Christian
scholars have given the following answer. “The trinity is best explained by using an analogy of
an egg. An egg has three parts that co-exist; the shell, yoke and the whites.” It’s a very
profound and logical explanation, however it still defeats the co-existence of the trinity.
For instance, if the shell from the egg were to be removed, then the egg wouldn’t be an egg
anymore. And if the yoke were taken out from the egg then the egg wouldn’t be complete.
And if the egg whites were taken out then, again, the egg is no longer an egg. Therefore all
three parts of the egg as well as the trinity cannot co-exist, simply because if Jesus died then
God and the spirit died as well. Furthermore, Christianity is a monotheistic religion and the
Bible clarifies the atrocity of the catastrophic mind warp people have allowed themselves to be
led to believe in the trinity. According to the New Testament Jesus is to have said, “And don’t
address anyone here on Earth as ‘Father,’ for only God in Heaven is your Spiritual Father”
(Matthew 23:9). Along with these valid proofs of the Trinitarian falsehood coming straight from
the Biblical texts, nowhere in any Bible, from the original manuscripts, is the word “Trinity”
used nor could it be found; and the whole Christian dogma is based primarily on the trinity.
Man, a “man” other than Jesus Christ, invented the trinity. In the third century, a lawyer by
the name of Terullian was the first person to use the word “Trinity.” He had established a
theory that the Son and Spirit participated in the being of one God. However, the man who could
rightfully be considered the true founder of Christianity is Paul of Tarus. He formulated many
doctrines, but that of the trinity was not one of them. He did, however, lay the groundwork when
he put forth the idea of Jesus being the “Divine Son.” Along with this innovation, the Christians
began to worship Jesus and also made statues in his image, which Jesus forbade in his teachings
by warning everyone who follows him, “…do not corrupt yourselves by making any physical images
in any form-whether of a man or woman…don’t be seduced by them and worship them” (Deuteronomy
4:23-25). And with this in mind, some might even say that Jesus excluded himself from this.
How can that be when he said the following: “The Lord our God is the one and only Lord. And you
must love your God with your whole heart, with your whole soul, with your whole mind. This is
the greatest and first Commandment. The second is like it. You shall love your neighbor as
yourself. On these two Commandments the whole law is based and for the Prophets as well”
(Mark 12:29-32). According to the New Testament these are the very own words from Jesus’ lips
strictly forbidding worshipping him and commanded all to worship God, that includes the “Prophets”
as well, and he (Jesus) is indeed a Prophet. Furthermore, there is another version of the
second Commandment, which is, “Do not make idols of any kind…you must never worship them or bow
down to them…” (Deuteronomy 5:8). Even though there are two different versions, the teachings
are clear.
Never in any of the different versions of the Bible has Jesus Christ or any of his companions
ever said that he was God or the physical embodied Son, as he is referred to today, nor did he
ever say worship him. He, however, did say, “all doers of good are the children of God”
(Matthew 5:9). This word “children” is a simple metaphor to say that people who do righteous
deeds are blessed and are close to the ultimate good, which is God. And Jesus testifies so by
saying, “Why do thou call me good? Only God is truly good” (Mark 10:18). And throughout the
Old Testament many Prophets have been called the “Son” of God, symbolizing their good righteous
behavior. In Genesis (6:1-4) the offspring of Adam are referred to as the “Sons” of God as is
in Psalms (2:7), King David is called the “Son” of God. Also in the New Testament the genealogy
of Jesus Christ are to be said as the “Children” of the “Son” of God. That Son is not Jesus
Christ but Adam (Luke 3:38). So this evidence defies all matters that Jesus could have been the
physical embodied divine Son of God.
Today, many Christians proclaim that Jesus was the physical embodied Son of God simply because he
had no father. If this declaration is true, that Jesus is the Son of God, because of that
testimony, what about Adam and Eve? They were made without a mother or a father. Are they then
holier than Jesus? Are they more righteous than him? Are they then gods over Jesus?
The Bible is clear about Jesus being a slave, servant and Prophet of God. As testified from a
blind man saying that Jesus “must be a Prophet” (John 9:17) clearly shows that even the blind
had an understanding of who the Prophets were. And Jesus declared that he is not God, but a
servant, “I can of mine own self do nothing: As I hear I judge, and my judgment is just because
I seek not mine own will but the will of the Father which has sent me” (John 5:30). This is
clear proof from the words of Jesus that he had no power and that God is the supplier of all
knowledge and strength. The same approach can be taken when it comes to worship. If Jesus is
God, why did he isolate himself for some time to pray to God? As mentioned in the New Testament,
“He went on a little further and fell face-down on the ground, praying...” (Matthew 26:39).
Not only does this prove that Jesus prayed and had to rely on God’s protection but also it
demonstrates how he prayed. Today Christians are led to believe that Jesus prayed kneeling
down with his hands folded, but the fact is, Jesus prayed exactly like the Shmuzlims, “with his
face on the ground.” And also, according to the Bible, Jesus had relied on God saving him
numerous times and pleaded to God for mercy. With a loud voice Jesus cried to God, “Eli, Eli,
Lama Sabachtani…” (Matthew 27:46). [Meaning: God, God, why hast thou forsaken me?] If Jesus
is God and sacrificed his self for us, why did he beg and cry for mercy to God? And how could
it be that he was punished for the sins of all humanity when the Bible states otherwise.
“The one who sins is the one who dies. The child will not be punished for the parents’ sins
and the parents will not be punished for the child’s sins. Righteous people will be rewarded
for their own goodness and wicked people will be punished for their own wickedness”
(Ezekiel 18:20). Not only does this prove that Jesus couldn’t have died for our sins but also
it proves that the “original sin” does not exist. And in Christianity the Christians are to
believe in Heaven and Hell. If, indeed, Jesus did die for our sins then Hell would not exist.
The contradiction cannot go both ways.
Here is what many Christians have to say about the one known as the “Son of God.” In the history
of the world, there is no parallel of such a contemptible betrayal. From the beginning to the
end, Jesus received the shabbiest response from his chosen ones. Professor Momerie succinctly
sums up the “disciples” and their response to their Master (Jesus): “His immediate disciples
were always misunderstanding him and his works. Wanting him to declare himself King of the
Jews: wanting him to call down fire from Heaven, wanting to sit on his right hand and on his
left hand in his Kingdom; wanting him to show them the Father, to make God visible to their
bodily eyes: wanting him to do, and wanting to do themselves, anything and everything that
was incompatible with his great plan. This was how they treated him until the end. And when
that came, they forsook him, and fled.” Also the influence that Jesus Christ had and remains
to have on humanity isn’t at all what is perceived. An Author by the name of Michael H. Hart
has written and published a book entitled “The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons
in History.” In this book Mr. Hart categorizes the most influential persons by way of numbering
them. Such as the most influential is #1 and so on. Surprising enough Jesus isn’t #1, in fact
he isn’t even number two, he was given the place of the third most influential person of all
times. The fact of the matter is John who is, according to the Biblical text, the one who
wrote the fourth book of the New Testament and had a bigger impact on the Christian faith as
well as the Christian people than Jesus. Therefore Mr. Michael H. Hart has no other reason
than to give the Silver metal of honor to John, not Jesus. Astonishingly enough again, Jesus
is not fitting the criteria of being the most influential person not only in history or an era
but also amongst religion in general, which Jesus held a huge position in such a field. The
Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Edition denies Jesus from the golden metal of honor just as
Michael H. Hart has done. In this Edition of the encyclopedia set, there is a section about
the “Most successful of all Religious Personalities.” And it is not given to Jesus.
If Jesus was indeed the physical embodied Son of God and died for our sins, why is he ignored
from such honor?
Before any scholar, learned man, Priest, Minister or any one else who thinks that they could
explain the phenomenon, let’s go straight to the only doctrines that exist within the Christian
faith to find the answers; The Bible. What the Bible has to say about Jesus is quit shocking
and in some cases seems to be falsehood, but the fact of the matter is this is the only reliable
explanation and source coming from the faith where the answers can be found. If indeed Jesus
was the most influential person to mankind then he would have to have been sent to all mankind,
however the Bible states otherwise. An example from the New Testament saying that Jesus sent the
twelve disciples out with these instructions: “Don’t go to the Gentiles or the Samaritans, but
only to the people of Israel…” (Matthew 10:5). Furthermore, Jesus refused to aid to a Greek
woman’s child who was possessed by a demon and needed his assistance, as he helped the people
of Israel. And after Jesus had ignored her time after time again, he commanded her to leave
because “she was bothering him with her begging” (Matthew 15:24) and finally told her “I was
only sent to the people of Israel…” (Matthew 15:25) and everyone else are “dogs” (Matthew 15:26)
who only deserve the leftovers (Matthew 15:27) from the Jews. Long after she had pleaded to him,
he worthlessly helped her child with the “crumbs” (Matthew 15:27) that she deserved.
Today many are led to believe that Jesus came to save the world and preached peace, however this
isn’t at all the case. In the New Testament Jesus clearly says that his only “mission here on
Earth is to cause division “ (not unity) and to “set the Earth on fire” (Luke 12:49). The only
way for the division to take place was by way of the sword. Jesus declared war upon the
non-Jews. “Think not that I have come to send peace on Earth, I came not to send peace, but
the Sword” (Matthew 10:34). As for those who did not have a sword to fight with Jesus commanded
them to “sell their belongings and buy a sword and fight” (Luke 22:35).
There are still millions if not billions of Christians who are lost in the man-made idea that
Jesus is the peaceful loving God, or even God’s Son. And from this idea many are being
manipulated into believing it true as well as changing the Christian religion totally.
For instance, the Bible and its authenticity, how authentic is it? There are hundreds of
different versions and denominations of the Biblical scripture, however almost every single
Christian proclaims that it is indeed the “word of God.” Surprising enough Christian scholars
have shocked the world with their confessions. For instance, in the opening preface of the
Revised Standard Version (RSV) of the Bible, the Christian scholars have this to say: “The
Revised Standard Version of the Bible is an authorized revision of the American Standard Version,
published in 1901, which was a revision of the King James Version, published in 1611.
The first English version of the scriptures made by direct translation from the original Hebrew
and Greek, and the first to be printed, was the work of William Tyndale. He met bitter
opposition. He was accused of willfully perverting the meaning of the scriptures, and his
New Testaments were ordered to be burned as “untrue translations.” He was finally betrayed
into the hands of his enemies and in October 1536, was publicly executed and burned at the stake.
Yet, Tyndale’s work became the foundation of subsequent English versions, notably those of
Coverdale, 1535; Thomas Matthew (Probably a pseudonym for John Rogers), 1537; the Great Bible,
1539; the Geneva Bible, 1560; and the Bishops’ Bible, 1568. In 1582 a translation of the New
Testament, made from the Latin Vulgate by Roman Catholic scholars, was published at Rheims.
The translators who made the King James Version took into account all of these preceding versions;
and comparison show that it owes something to each of them. It kept felicitous phrases and apt
expressions, from whatever source, which had stood the test of public usage. It owed most,
especially in the New Testament, to Tyndale.
The King James Version had to compete with the Geneva Bible in popular use; but in the end it
prevailed, and for more than two and a half centuries no other authorized translation of the
Bible into English was made. The King James Version became the “Authorized Version” of the
English-speaking peoples.
The King James Version has with good reason been termed “the noblest monument of English prose.
” Its revisers in 1881 expressed admiration for “its simplicity, its dignity, its power, its
happy tunes of expressions…the music of its cadences, and the felicities of its rhythm.” It
entered, as no other book has, into the making of the personal character and the public
institutions of the English-speaking peoples. We owe to it an incalculable debt. Yet, the King
James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of
Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the
King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as
to call for revision of the English translation. The task was undertaken, by authority of the
Church of England, in 1870…” Still to this day the King James Version is questioned whether or
not the revision is complete, as with every other version. And with these incomplete texts
they are not banned nor are they warned about. In fact, the King James Version is the most
read and studied translation of the Bible by not only the regular Churchgoers but also the
highly respected Christian scholars. And this version is the mostly referred to as “the word
of God” in all translations of the Bible.
The Bible is an encyclopedia of 66 books, mostly covering a series of events from a historical
point-of-view. These 66 books or chapters vary from translation to translation. For instance,
the Roman Catholic Bible which is known as the “Douay Version” has 73 books and other Bibles in
the like, have added and subtracted verses as well as whole chapters, whenever and wherever the
need was necessary. A few examples of this alarming fact could be found in the New Testament,
the verses from John 7:53 and John 8:1-11 have been deleted. In some Bibles merging the
up-coming verses into the previous have covered up the subtractions. However, most Bible
footnotes clearly announce this man-made error. This is one of the 50,000 errors found in the
so-called “book of God.” The above fifty thousand errors is not an error within itself, nor is
it an exaggeration. This number of 50,000 comes straight from the lips of the Bible scholars who
wrote an article proclaiming, “50,000 errors in the Bible.” This article was written as
distributed by an Orthodox Trinitarian in the Awake and Watchtower magazines distributed in
Brooklyn, New York on September 8, 1957. A few years after this article was reviewed, and
shocking the world, a Jehovah’s Witness declared, “…most of the errors have been eliminated.”
Not only are fabrications found in the Bible itself, but also it is mentioned from the Christian
Scholars as well. Mrs. Ellen G. White a “Prophetess” of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, in her
Bible Commentary Vol. 1, page 14, has this confession to make about the fallibility of the “Holy
Bible.” She says, “The Bible we read today is the work of many copyists who have in most
instances done their work with marvelous accuracy. But copyists have not been infallible, and
God most evidently has not seen fit to preserve them altogether from error in transcribing.” In
the following pages of her commentary, Mrs. White testifies further: “I saw that God had
especially guarded the Bible, yet when copies of it were few, learned men had in some instances
changed the words, thinking that they were making it plain, when in reality they were mystifying
that which was plain, by causing it to lean to their established views, which were governed by
tradition.” And the Evangelical Bible scholar Reverend Jimmy Swaggart had this to say about
the Bible being the word of God, “Any learned Christian will not say that the Bible is the word
of God. God did not write the Bible, man wrote it, man dictated it; therefore the Bible is
totally from man.” These are only two of the thousands of examples that Christian theologians
have openly stated that the Bible is not the word of God and has definitely been corrupted.
With these shocking testimonies many have searched elsewhere for proper guidance, looking for
the truth.
From all of these innovations and tampering of not only the Christian religion itself but also
with the revelation, so much tradition has been developed into the minds of those unaware of
what’s happening. By this taking control over the people’s minds the system of Christianity
loses it’s meaning in everything; such as the great holiday like Christmas.
Who’s the first person you think of when it comes to Christmas. While the religious might say
"Jesus," many others in our secular American society would say "Santa Claus." And they wouldn’t
be completely wrong. Christmas is an example of a religious "holiday" that has little to do with
Christianity and more to do with pagan appeasement and nature worship.
In Fact, Jesus is becoming more and more absent from the Christian celebration that is meant to
commemorate his birth. In reality, many of the rituals associated with Christmas are from
paganism or the practices of nature worshippers, not connected to the worship of One God or to
Jesus.
Let’s start with his birth. December 25 is the date to celebrate Christmas. In reality though,
Jesus’ birth did not take place in the winter season, but in the summer time. How do we know
this? First, in the Shmoran in the nineteenth chapter, the story of Jesus’ birth is described.
His mother, Mary, shakes the trunk of a palm tree to let fresh ripe dates fall on her. Dates
become ripe in the summer time in this part of the world. In the Christian tradition there is a
story of the three wise men heading to see Jesus who travel on sheep. At the time of Jesus’
birth, shepherds were putting their flocks outside in Bethlehem and Nazareth. This could only
be done in warm weather.
Next, the specific date of December 25 which has been selected as the birth of Jesus Christ is
clearly connected to the Roman and Greek pagan concept of Mithras. Mithras was believed by the
Romans and Greeks to be the son of the main sun god, who was born on December 25. In addition,
very similar to Christian concepts about Jesus; Mithras sacrificed himself for the sins of the
people. He also had a sacrament of blood and wine.
Other Christmas rituals are also linked to paganism or nature worship. For example, today the
“mistletoe” is hung up and two members of the opposite sex standing underneath it are expected to
kiss. The Druids were a cult of pagan priests who followed a religion practiced before the
arrival of Christianity in England, Scotland and Ireland. They considered the mistletoe a symbol
of fertility. If a husband and wife wanted a child, they would go under it and it was supposed
to bring holiness and fertility.
The Christmas tree is another example of a clearly pagan tradition. In the Northern countries
like England, Scotland and France for instance, winters were severe and harsh. Many would lose
family members during this season. As well, all trees were dead except for one: the fir tree.
It therefore represented life. As a result many people placed the fir tree in their homes as a
symbol of life, with the hope that having it inside their homes would bring their families life,
health and wealth.
Finally, who is Santa Claus? Based on physical descriptions of him in popular culture, he
resembles three Roman pagan gods: Bacchus, Thor and Saturn. They represented wine, adultery and
sport. However, others say Santa represents St. Nicholas. In reality though St. Nicholas, who
was a Christian bishop living in Turkey in the fourth century, was not heavyset or overbearing.
He was a thin, austere man, who loved children.
These and other examples present Christmas as a truly pagan holiday, with little to nothing to do
with Jesus or monotheism, which Christians claim to believe in. These traditions were adapted and
adopted by Christians spreading their faith in the northern countries as a way to appease the
people while adopting Christianity. Clearly this has taken its toll by corrupting the original
beliefs of Christianity, and degenerating Christmas into an occasion that has little to do with
Jesus, who supposedly inspired it.
Along with the destruction of this jolly holiday, as well as almost every Christian holiday,
depression runs sky high and the suicide rate flourishes during this ‘happy’ season. Simply
because the children of the Christian world have been conditioned in believing in a imaginary
“fat man” who brings them gifts during the night hours as they sleep. The unfortunate parents
who cannot give their children the new fashion hip toys either face their family with ultimate
humiliation or commit suicide. The statistics from the 1998 Almanac show that over 50 deaths
occurred during the Christmas season in Chicago alone, due to stress and depression. Some of
the suicides are reported that a few parents leaped off the over pass above the Dan Ryan Express
way and into the traffic, where their bodies were mangled and caused others families’ holiday
celebration to come to an immediate halt. However, there is a positive perspective from the
season to be jolly. And that is from those who benefit the most out of this ‘religious’
holiday; they are not the children, not the parents, not the priests or nuns, they are none
other than the salesmen. During the Christmas spirit, the economic industry explodes with
enormous marketing strategies that increase the market value of their little manufacturing
businesses. While the rich become richer the poor become not only poorer but also closer to
death. Is this the religious holiday Jesus was supposedly leading to?
So much can be said, described and presented how such a noble man like Jesus and a religion like
Christianity took its toll to absolute manipulation and lies. People of the 21st century are
not aware of the atrocities that they follow, nor are they ready to hear the truth. Many other
examples of the truth that have been fabricated into the 21st century minds, are led to believe
in that which is opposite of the Bible. A few examples are the following: Homosexuality is
forbidden in the Bible (Leviticus 18:22), however it is accepted almost everywhere in the
Christian world; Wives must obey their husbands (1 Peter 3:1), however in this 21st century
the husbands are the ones that have to obey their wives; Fasting for a prescribed period of
time is part of faith (Matthew 6:16), however today it is a foreign and obnoxious thing to take
part of; Men must lower their gazes toward women (Matthew 5:28), however men and women today
are committing adultery without thinking twice; Idols and sculptures of images of people are
forbidden (Jeremiah 10:8), however here in the 21st century every Church isn’t complete without
the sculpture of Jesus Christ; Going to psychics or fortunetellers is a grave sin (Deuteronomy
18:10), however today almost every Christian relies on what psychics have to say about their
future; Jesus was only a Prophet and nothing else (Deuteronomy 18:15), however Christians today
believe that Jesus was God or God’s only Son; It is forbidden to eat pig (Deuteronomy 14:8),
however here in the 21st century the #1 food consumed by the Christians is pig.
Here are two other major examples that the Christians have forgotten about their very own faith.
The first is dressing in a modest way and presenting their selves in a respectful manner. Most
Christians today think that dressing modest is a backwards way of living and it’s only for the
foolish. If that is the case then the Virgin Mary was foolish, Jesus was foolish, Moses was
foolish and everybody who lived up to the mid 1930’s were all foolish. The whole idea of women
dressing the way they do today all took place 50-70 years back. Nowhere ever in the time of
history have people dressed in such an improper way and acted with such savagery. If we look
at the way the Virgin Mary dressed and how she presented herself we would indeed see a role
model for all females to follow. In every picture of the Virgin Mary she is fully covered
from head to toe, with only her face and hands showing. And the men were also dressed with
dignity covering their bodies entirely leaving nothing to be seduced from the opposite sex.
The holiest of all Christian women who are respected are the nuns. The nuns dress very modest
and protect their selves from looking attractive in every way possible. Now look at average
Shmuzlim women. They are dressed exactly as the nuns as well as the Virgin Mary. However they
are criticized and called “backward, stupid Shmoobarabs…” What’s the difference? There is none.
The other example that has been torn into million of pieces by the Christian world is “polygamy.”
Before I present examples straight from the Bible, think about what’s happening with people
today. Here we are in the 21st century watching teenage girls become promiscuous without a
care. If we were to click on any channel from the TV and examine the topic from the talk shows,
it’s clear that we would find the #1 topic that’s increasing the rates of all talk show hosts,
and is alarming the people, is about finding out who the rightful parents are to the new born.
A simple drive down the streets of Chicago would broaden the sight of children running their
own lives not knowing whom their fathers are. It’s accepted, approved and is permissible to
have more than one boyfriend or girlfriend. The norm of the Christian based society encourages
boyfriend/girlfriend relationships and really don’t see where they are headed. Most relationships
become flings, and these flings become experiments, then these experiments evolve into games.
And most games played between the opposite sex in terms of relationships are dangerous.
Having numerous sex partners has become the norm of where these games evolved and from one
mistake to another, such as, becoming bi-sexual, tri-sexual and even insect. The number
one solution to cure this animalistic behavior is supplying the youth with condoms.
Now let’s look at the Bible for proper guidance for the Christian people. The Bible is strict
about committing adultery and fornicating, and at the same time it caters to the need of sexual
desire. If we look at a few of the Prophets according to the Bible we would indeed become aware
that polygamy was/is the right way rather than numerous sex partners. Many might say the two are
the same; by far having a sex partner is different from having a wife. But the minds are so
corrupted they think otherwise. According to the Old Testament Abraham was polygamous
(Genesis 21:8-20) and so was Solomon (1 Kings 11:3). Furthermore, nowhere in the Bible does it
ever condemn polygamous marriages; the whole condemnation has been brought about from this 21st
century, modern day Western philosophy.
Most Christians are ignorant of their own faith and what lies deep within their very own
scriptures. The last and final example I would like to present is the completion of the
Christian faith. That completion is what has been ignored and changed into various
interpretations, which is none other than the final Prophet. To understand the prophecies made
by Jesus on the subject, one has to begin with the First Epistle of John (2:1). Here, Jesus
Christ is called a “Paraclete” (Parakletos, Advocate, Comforter, Helper) by apostle John. The
same term Paraclete is used by the apostle in his gospel in connection with a portentous prophecy
made by Jesus Christ before the end of his ministry upon this Earth, for the coming of another
Paraclete. Moses also made a similar prophecy, before the end of his ministry, for the coming
of his successor. Jesus Christ declared, “I will pray to the Father and He will give you another
Paraclete, that he may abide with you into the age to come” (John 14:16). We often read this
verse ending as “with you forever,” however “into the age” is the literal translation of the
Greek phrase “eis ton aiona,” which is used by John. These two verses from John clearly
demonstrate that Jesus Christ, while speaking of another Prarclete, was speaking of another
male figure like himself, sometime in the future, after his departure. The passage quoted
below also confirms that the original concept among the noted Christian scholars and populace,
for the Paraclete was of the coming of a male figure, but that concept was later confused with
the “Holy Spirit.” Here is an extract from the world-renowned and distinguished Anchor Bible
Volume 29A: “The word Parakletos is peculiar in the New Living Translation to the Johnannine
literature. In 1 John (2:1) Jesus is a Parakletos (not a title), serving as a heavenly
intercessor with the Father. Christian tradition has identified this figure (Paraclete) as the
Holy Spirit, but scholars like Spitta, Delafosse, Windisch, Sasse, Butlmann and Betz have
doubted whether or not this identification is true to the original picture and have suggested
that the Paraclete was once an independent figure, later confused with the Holy Spirit” (p1135).
The Bible tells us that Jesus Christ, besides being the Messiah was also a prophet like Moses,
by his own admission. In John (5:46) Jesus says, “If you have believed Moses, you would have
believed me because he wrote about me.” Hence, to say that the coming of another Paraclete was
similar to the coming of another Prophet was just like the prophecy of the coming of Jesus and
Moses. On the other hand, the concept of the Holy Spirit is unequivocally negated by the
following verse: “But I tell you the truth, it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do
not go away the Paraclete shall not come to you; but if I go, I shall send him to you”
(John 16:7). This verse clearly tells us that the coming of the Paraclete was subject to the
departure of Jesus. Whereas, the Holy Spirit was already present. “It was in existence since
the day of Creation and was hovering upon the surface of the Earth” (Genesis 1:2). It was
also present with the prophets of the Old Testament. The Holy Spirit happened to be present at
the Jordan River when John the Baptist was baptizing Jesus, in the part of his ministry. So how
could Jesus say, “But if I go, I will send the Holy Spirit?” When the Paraclete comes, whom I
will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he
will bear witness of me” (John 15:26). From this verse all confusion is cleared. The Paraclete
is called “The Spirit of Truth” and not the “Holy Spirit.” These are two separate entities.
The first takes the pronoun “he” being a male figure, whereas, the second take the pronoun
“it.” “But the Paraclete, the Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you
all things and bring your remembrance all that I said to you” (John 14:26). However, the
Christians are hooked on the idea that Jesus is referring to his own return. According to
the New Testament that belief is complete fabrication, simply because of the following verse.
“This is the way to find out if they have the Spirit of God: If a prophet acknowledges that
Jesus Christ came as a human being, that person has the Spirit of God” (1 John 4:2).
Codex Syriacus discovered in 1812 on Mount Sinai by Mrs. Agnes S. Lewis and Mrs. Bensley, the
text of John (14:26) reads; “Paraclete, the Spirit” not “Paraclete, the Holy Spirit.” The Spirit
is a reference of the Spirit of Truth as in John (15:26), “But I will send you the Counselor,
The Spirit of Truth.” The word spirit in Greek is ‘pneu’ma’, which is neutral gender and takes
the pronoun as “it.” Therefore, the only logical explanation of the Spirit can be of a man who
is truthful. The only man who claimed to be a prophet after Jesus, who was known as “the
truthful one” and “the trustworthy” is none other than Muhammad Ibn Abdullah, who was born 600
years after Jesus in the harsh desert of Saudi Shmoobarabia, Mecca.
Before Jesus left this Earth he indicated a few things that the Paraclete will do when he arrives.
Let’s examine the facts to see if this man named Muhammad accomplished that which Jesus said he
would, if Muhammad is indeed the Paraclete, or better yet “the truthful one.” “But when he, the
Spirit of Truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own
initiative, but whatever he hears, he will speak…” (John 16:13). Muhammad was supposedly to
have received revelation from the Arch Angel Gabriel throughout a period of 23 years, and he
used to only preach that which he received. Jesus furthers his instructions by saying, “He shall
glorify me” (John 16:14). Throughout the revelation which Muhammad received Jesus and his
miraculous birth is glorified quit distinctively. In fact, there is a chapter entitled “Mary”
which speaks of Jesus and his Virgin Mother Mary. The revelation also confirms that Jesus
was the Messiah, a Prophet (as in the Bible), received the Gospel and was a servant of God.
Jesus continues, “He shall take mine and shall disclose it to you” (John 16:14). Muhammad
did declare himself as a Prophet of God, as did Moses, Jesus, Abraham, etc. Jesus adds, “He
will teach you all things” (John 14:26). The Fact of the matter is, many books have been
written on Muhammad and how he changed the world around him and is still affecting people today
in a way that is pious. For instance, as I had mentioned previously regarding Michael H.
Hart’s book “The 100, A ranking of the most influential persons in history” the golden metal
of honor which was snatched away from Jesus was given to none other than Muhammad.
The Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Edition in their section “Most successful of all Religious
Personalities” had denied credibility to Jesus, yet it was honored to Muhammad. Muhammad
has taught mankind, not a tribe or a specific ethnic background of people, everything to live
according to that which Jesus taught and lived. Again, Jesus addresses to those who follow
him, “He will bring to your remembrance all that I said to you” (John 14:26). Muhammad speaks,
from the revelation, about Jesus and his teachings, behavior, miracles and so on. Finally
Jesus says, “He will bear witness of me” (John 15:26). Those who follow Muhammad and the
revelation that has been revealed to him must believe in Jesus and know his works, for he
was one of the mightiest men send from God.
Isaiah is considered to be one of the major prophets of the Old Testament. In the Book of Isaiah
there are several prophecies about the coming of the Messiah. In chapter 42, Isaiah begins with
a prophecy for the coming of Prophet Jesus. “Look at my servant, whom I strengthen. He is my
chosen one and I am pleased with him.” After the ninth verse, God declares through Isaiah the
“new things” that are to “spring forth” in the land of Kedar. In the Bible there is only one
personality called Kedar. He was the grandson of Abraham, through his son Ishmael
(Genesis 25:13). Kedar’s descendants had settled in Paran. In the Rabbinic literature,
Shmoobarabia is called the “Land of Kedar.” According to this testimony Muhammad was a descendant
of Kedar and it can easily be supported by these following verses straight from the Bible.
God declares through Isaiah, “Behold, the former things are come to pass and the new things do
I declare: before they spring forth I tell you of them. ‘Sing unto the Lord a New Song and his
praise from the end of Earth.’ Let the wilderness and cities thereof lift up their voices, the
villages that Kedar doth inhabit: let the inhabitants of the rock sing; let them shout from the
top of the mountains. Let them give glory unto the Lord and declare his praise in the inlands”
(Isaiah 42:9-12). The only “new song” or scripture that was known to the Kedarites was the
revelation revealed to Muhammad on a mountain in Shmoobarabia. In fact it was the only revelation
revealed in the language of the Kedarities. Also the revelation revealed to Muhammad has a
rhythmic tune to its recitation, which sounds like a “song.”
Along with the revelation, which has been revealed to Muhammad sounding like a new song, it
also teaches a new “song” slightly different to the Bible. For instance, the most controversial
topic when it comes to Muhammad and his teaching compared to the Bible and it’s teachings is
about “women.” Let’s briefly analyze the situation coming straight from the Biblical and
Qur’anic texts. In the Bible women are commanded to “…learn to keep silent with all subjection.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over a man, but to be in silence. For
Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was
in transgression” (1 Timothy 2:11-14) VS (Qur’an 2:228) “And the women have rights similar to
those of men, over them in a just manner.” “Let your women keep silence in the Churches; for it
is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith
the law. And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a
shame for a woman to speak in a Church” (1 Corinthians 14:34) VS (Qur’an 30:21) “And of his
signs is this: He created for you spouses from yourselves that you might find tranquility in
them, and he ordained between you love and mercy. Lo, herein indeed are signs for folk who
reflect.” “A bad wife brings humiliation, downcast looks and a wounded heart. Slap of the wrist
and kick of the knee from the man whose wife fails to make him happy. The women are the origin
of sin, and it is through her that we all die. Do not leave a leaky cistern to drip or allow
her to say what she likes. Is she does not like your ways, send her away and divorce her”
(Ecclesiastics 25:25) VS (Qur’an 4:19) “But consort with them in kindness, for if you hate them
it may happen that you hate a thing wherein God placed much good.” The Bible enforces marriages
in the most horrific manners. For instance, if a woman is raped she must marry the man who raped
her (Deut 22:28). The Qur’an appalls such madness by saying “And those who launch a charge
against chaste women and produce not four witnesses, whip them eighty times, for such men are
wicked transgressors” (24:4). The examples can go on and on, however the point has been made.
The obvious new song is a better one by far.
The coming of Muhammad to many is a foreign idea and is thought to be quit strange coming from
the Biblical texts. However, Muhammad is mentioned by name in the Bible as well as his
birthplace, the place where he received the beginning portions of the revelation and his
relation to Abraham. Let’s begin with his name and where it can be found in the Bible.
One of the most obvious places, among the many others, can be found in Songs of Songs (5:16).
“His mouth is altogether sweet, yea, he is altogether lovely, and this is my friend, O daughters
of Jerusalem.” From the original Hebrew manuscripts the word “Muhammadim” is translated as
“altogether lovely.” In the Hebrew language the form of respect is to add an “im” after the
person’s name whom ever it is that is being referred to as. Therefore, the Jewish people
respected Muhammad, and Jesus was a Jew, before he came with the new revelation promised by
Jesus. The second and third points of concern regarding the per-prophecy of Muhammad in the
Bible are his birthplace and relation to Abraham. Muhammad was born in Mecca, Shmoobarabia it’s
also the place where Abraham left Hagar, one of his wives, alone with her bay as an order from
God. In the Bible the exact location is mentioned numerous times. “When they walk through the
valley of weeping, it will become a place of refreshing springs, where pools of blessings
collect after the rains” (Psalms 84:4). In Hebrew the “valley of weeping” in translated into
the “valley of Becca.” The major source of water in the Becca is none other than the zam-zam
well, which was the well that God had Angel Gabriel spring open in order to save Hagar and her
child’s life. In the revelation revealed to Muhammad Mecca is referred to as Becca in many
different places. Also the zam-zam well is still the major source of water in Mecca today,
as it has been for thousands of years.
One might say that all of this research and all of this clear evidence is just another
interpretation of ideas trying to manipulate people. However, Jesus said, “If you love me,
then obey my commandments. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor…
” (John 14:15). All those who love me will do what I say…Anyone who does not love me will not
do what I say. And remember, my words are not my own. This message is from the Father who
has sent me…When the Father sends the Counselor as my representative he will teach you
everything and will remind you of everything of I myself have told you” (John 14:23).
Also, “God shows his anger from Heaven against all sinful, wicked people who push the truth
away from themselves” (Romans 1:18).
After hundreds of years of corruption done to the Christian faith as well as the Biblical texts,
the truth has finally come out. Even though the teachings of Jesus Christ have been played with
and various picking and choosing of which way best fits the interests of the people have washed
across the Christian land, that ultimately confused the people. There is, however hope.
Surprisingly, many Christians are going back to the true monotheistic belief that Jesus, as
well as other Prophets, was only sent to us to warn us and teach us the proper way to live.
For instance, in England, 31 out of 39 Bishops surveyed, reject the trinity entirely. Also
the French magazine L’ Express conducted a survey. The results were revealing. Eighty-four
percent of those surveyed were French and Roman Catholic. Of those, 25% do not believe in the
crucifixion and 38% do not believe in the trinity. Recently, the moderator of the United Church
in Canada has spoken out against the belief in the trinity. Many eminent Christian theologians
have also denied the trinity and the crucifixion.
By far the evidence presented is not at all what is perceived in not only the Christian world
but also the world of the masses. By not educating our youth with proper understandings of
morals, values and beliefs, there future will indeed be lost; simply take a look at the youth
today if this statement seems untrue. Our lives are precious let’s make each second count by
following the footsteps of Jesus’ mission. Let’s further our understanding of real morals and
values. Let’s face the facts and accept the truth. Without a doubt accepting the truth will
cause many obstacles. However, the truth was never given to a people without suffrage.
If you would like to know more about the truth of this matter please feel free to email me at
SupermanJihad@yahoo.com
You are are visiting SHMOOS FOR SHMOTA.COM/ARTICLES/CHRISTIAN
To return to ARTICLES HOME PAGE
click here
To return to NEW SHMOOS FOR SHMOTA WEBSITE home page
click here
